Notes on keeping a journal · · 5 min read
Does gratitude journaling work? An honest look for bad days
Does gratitude journaling work? What meta-analyses found, why listing ten things a day backfires, what toxic gratitude is, and what to write on a bad day.
- does gratitude journaling work
- gratitude journal
- toxic gratitude
- nothing to be grateful for
- bad days
Some days you open your gratitude journal and honestly have nothing to write. Not out of laziness, but because the day was bad, and "thankful for the sunshine" reads like a joke at your expense. On days like that it's easy to decide the whole practice is self-deception.
So does gratitude journaling work if it fails exactly when you need it most? There is an answer, but it's more modest than the gold-foil notebooks suggest. Below: what the research found, where the practice breaks down, and what to write when there's nothing to be grateful for.
Does gratitude journaling work? What the meta-analyses say
The modern practice traces back to a 2003 study by Robert Emmons and Michael McCullough: people who regularly wrote down things they were grateful for rated their lives better, on average, than people who wrote about hassles or just events. Many studies followed, and eventually researchers began pooling them.
Gratitude exercises improved well-being more than comparable neutral activities, but the effect was small. There was no clear effect on anxiety. And against other psychological exercises, gratitude did as well, but not better.
A few years later David Cregg and Jennifer Cheavens pooled 27 studies (3,675 participants) on depression and anxiety specifically. The effect was small again: the exercises helped a little, but they are no substitute for treatment.
So why keep a gratitude journal at all
The honest takeaway: a gratitude journal isn't medicine. It's a small, pleasant habit with a small effect. That's no reason to drop it. It's a reason not to expect miracles, and not to blame yourself when it doesn't rescue a bad day.
Why listing ten things a day can backfire
Many templates ask for five or ten things every day. It sounds generous, but there's a trap psychologists have known about since 1991. Norbert Schwarz and colleagues asked people to recall either 6 or 12 times they had acted assertively. Those asked for 12 later rated themselves as less assertive: if examples are hard to come up with, there must not be many.
That study isn't about gratitude, but the mechanism is the same. If you're squeezing out item number ten, your mind concludes there's nothing to be grateful for, and on a bad day that feeling only gets stronger.
Frequency matters too. Sonja Lyubomirsky and colleagues described a study in which counting blessings once a week helped more than doing it three times a week. A likely explanation: repeated too often, the practice becomes routine and stops meaning anything.
Toxic gratitude: when "be grateful" gets in the way
Toxic gratitude is using gratitude to avoid looking at what's wrong: "others have it worse, so stop complaining". It's as easy to say to yourself as to anyone else.
The trouble is that suppressed sadness doesn't go anywhere. In three studies, Brett Ford and colleagues found that people who accept their negative feelings and thoughts without judging them get less upset by stressors and feel better six months later. Accepting means not arguing with the feeling. It doesn't mean resigning yourself to the situation.
So a gratitude journal shouldn't be a place where "today was bad" is forbidden. First an honest line about how things are. Then, if you find one, a small thing that helped you get through. Both lines are true, and one doesn't cancel the other. Putting a name to what you feel is covered in the emotion diary piece.
What to write in a gratitude journal on a bad day
One line instead of five. One thing is already an entry. If you found nothing, "nothing today" is an honest entry too.
What was bearable. Not "what am I thankful for" but "what was at least bearable today": hot tea, a quiet bus, the fact that the day is over.
Imagine it never happened. In 2008 Minkyung Koo, Sara Algoe, Timothy Wilson and Daniel Gilbert compared two ways of thinking about good things in life. Some participants wrote about how a positive event came about; others wrote about how it might never have happened. The second group felt better, even though people predicted the opposite. On a bad day this is gentler than hunting for reasons: "if that friend hadn't called tonight…"
Thank a person, not the day. A day can be bad as a whole while one person in it wasn't. Who did something today they didn't have to do?
An empty day is an answer too. A missed entry breaks nothing. A gratitude journal you keep once a week is more honest than a daily one kept out of duty.
If you want concrete questions for ordinary days, there are forty in gratitude journal prompts that don't sound forced.
When a bad day isn't just one day
If "nothing to be grateful for" lasts for weeks rather than days, a gratitude journal isn't the main tool. That's exactly what the Cregg and Cheavens meta-analysis looked at: for depression and anxiety, these exercises have a small effect. Talking to a doctor or a psychologist is a better step. If things get really heavy, findahelpline.com lists free helplines in your country. More on what journaling can and can't do for anxiety is in a separate piece.
Sources
- Emmons, R. A., McCullough, M. E. Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377–389, American Psychological Association (2003)
- Davis, D. E. et al. Thankful for the little things: A meta-analysis of gratitude interventions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(1), 20–31, American Psychological Association (2016)
- Cregg, D. R., Cheavens, J. S. Gratitude Interventions: Effective Self-help? A Meta-analysis of the Impact on Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22, 413–445, Springer (2021)
- Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., Schkade, D. Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111–131, American Psychological Association (2005)
- Schwarz, N. et al. Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 195–202, American Psychological Association (1991)
- Koo, M., Algoe, S. B., Wilson, T. D., Gilbert, D. T. It's a wonderful life: Mentally subtracting positive events improves people's affective states, contrary to their affective forecasts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1217–1224, American Psychological Association (2008)
- Ford, B. Q., Lam, P., John, O. P., Mauss, I. B. The psychological health benefits of accepting negative emotions and thoughts: Laboratory, diary, and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 1075–1092, American Psychological Association (2018)